Free browser reaction benchmark

Reaction Time Test

Wait for the signal, respond as fast as you can, and get a five-trial median, best score and consistency.

VISUAL RESPONSEReaction benchmark
5 trials · median score

Click to begin

Wait for green, then click or tap as fast as you can. Early responses do not count.

or click the panel · Space also works

TimingBrowser + device
5-trial medianLess weight on one lucky click
Score contextSee what a fast score means
Device-awareHardware affects browser timing

Your browser and device are part of the timing. We do not guess away hardware delay.

COMPARE FAIRLY

Your setup changes the number

How browser timing works →

Your display, input method and system can shift the result. ReactionMetric uses the closest comparison with enough real results.

01Same setupDevice + input + refresh-rate bucket
02Same device + inputUsed when your exact setup still has too few results
03OverallUsed only when closer matches still have too few results
Percentiles need enough comparable results. We only show one after that comparison group reaches at least 100 contributed sessions.
WHY FIVE TRIALS

One lucky click is not your reaction time

See the protocol →
1238ms 2221ms 3229ms 4247ms 5310ms
Median resists one unusually slow or fast trial.

ReactionMetric also reports your best result and consistency so you can separate a repeatable baseline from one exceptional click.

MORE PERFORMANCE TESTS

Test a different kind of speed

GUIDES & CONTEXT

Understand and improve your score

Reaction time test FAQ

Is 200 ms reaction time slow?

A 200 ms browser result is fast in many common visual reaction tasks, but the number depends on the task and your device. Compare the same protocol and setup rather than treating one universal cutoff as clinical truth.

Is 170 ms a good reaction time?

170 ms is a very quick browser-observed result for a simple visual click task. Repeat several trials and check consistency before judging yourself from one attempt.

Is a 100 ms reaction time possible?

100 ms is at the extreme edge of a simple visual response. ReactionMetric treats responses below 100 ms as anticipatory and excludes them from valid trials. Scores at or just above 100 ms should still be interpreted cautiously because anticipation, display timing, input hardware and task design all matter.

Does a higher refresh-rate monitor improve a reaction time test?

A higher refresh rate can reduce the time between a browser scheduling a visual change and a new frame appearing, but it does not directly make your nervous system faster. That is why ReactionMetric records refresh-rate context instead of “correcting” your score.

Is this the same as a reflex test?

Not exactly. This page measures a simple visual reaction-time task. Our Visual Reflex Test is a separate browser task; neither is a clinical tendon or neurological reflex examination.

Not a clinical test. ReactionMetric measures browser-observed response timing. It does not diagnose neurological conditions or measure pure nervous-system latency. See the science notes and methodology for limitations.